Darby Strong

Playing point. Delivering the rock.

Search

  • About

Our Collective Narrative: How Story Can Help Envision the Future

Douglas Cohen has been described in many ways, from “sustainability leadership specialist” and “catalyst for a regenerative future” to “facilitator” and “trainer.” Douglas is a revered change agent and leading thinker, and his bio celebrates his “leadership development, sustainability literacy, and systemic change literacy, especially for tomorrow’s leaders.” I was lucky enough to take part in a very interesting exercise on how to create sustainable communities with him during a Marylhurst University Sustainability Advisory Council (MUSAC) get together, which helped to crystallize the sometimes ellusive idea of examining alternative futures.

Mr. Cohen, acting as facilitator, informed us that we were all now part of the “culture of the committed,” simply by being attendees. This declaration reminded me of positive workplace leadership strategies focused around alignment and engagement in order to create a committed group working towards common goals. Doug’s invitation to be a part of the narrative (which we are all a part of whether we accept the invitation or not) was a successful strategy, and reminded me of my social responsibility to step up to the proverbial plate.

Our collective talents and problem solving will be needed to overcome the most pressing of our earthly crises. Better yet, I’d like to borrow – and turn on its head a bit – the famous Margaret Mead quote that goes

“never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has”

I propose that, in fact, only our collective efforts will determine our future success, and this is particularly true regarding climate change. I hadn’t, though, imagined the idea that we could create an integrated narrative and use scenario planning in order to recognize the plot and therefore, the plot’s subsequent outcomes.

Doug began the meeting with a rapid-fire backdrop of the myriad organizations he is involved with, as well as mention of the Boston based think tank called the Tellus Institute. A quick Google search reveals that Tellus gathers data from teams of thought leaders hailing from varying disciplines who conduct research “to advance the transition to a sustainable, equitable, and humane global civilization.” From this work, Tellus has created a scenario planning toolkit that allow the “user to create, evaluate, and compare alternative futures based on current data and hypothetical trends.” One of the results is called the Great Transition Initiative. It is here that the use of envisioning an alternative future, and to me, the use of story and narrative, act as real forces in scaleable change.

How, though, do we transition from the narrative to implementation? First, we create the collective narrative. Our exercise for the hour was to gather around one of four quotes* that Doug provided for us. Choices included the great quote from Paul Hawken that says:

“If you look at the science about what is happening on earth and aren’t pessimistic, you don’t understand the data. But if you meet the people who are working to restore this earth and the lives of the poor, and you aren’t optimistic, you haven’t got a pulse.”

Another quote by William Gibson says:

“The Future is here, it’s just not widely distributed yet.”

The quote that drew me in was:

“We are a Society in search of a good post-capitalist model.”

I didn’t know it at the time, but Doug himself created this last quote. As four of us gathered around the “post-capitalist” model, others congregated around the idea that resonated with them the most and we began generating discussion. It dawned on me after the fact that we were in the process of envisioning alternative futures by discussing these various quotes, and I’d be interested to hear some of what came forth in the other groups.

Our group talked about localized economic systems, shared resources, and the behavioral paradigm shifts needed to realign the manner in which we share resources (or don’t) within our communities.

Like with any self-governing group working towards common goals, it proves to be especially difficult to implement some of the great thinking that comes from these collaborative efforts. To go from conversation to action can be a daunting task, and one that seems to often stall the forward motion of committed and compassionate people. While I’m not yet clear on how Mayrlhurst and MUSAC will use the beginning of this “narrative thread” to get from here to there, continuing the experiment in order to collectively create the overall University fabric is an exciting endeavor.

Above all, Douglas Cohen proved to be a generous connector of plot. Specifically, of our own combined narrative that provides us with the leading questions, and ultimately answers, to help us create strategies and solve the climate crisis within our own communities. In creating this story together, we create our own opportunities to also become the actors in a regenerative future. I imagine the ongoing conversation and work ahead will help us to envision our path and begin to implement some larger scale strategies towards that goal.

*There was also a longer quote by David Orr which I’ll update this post with in the near future

Games People Play

Have you heard of Jane McGonigal? Until yesterday, I hadn’t, which now makes me feel like I was perhaps living under a rock for quite some time. But thanks to meeting up with a friend yesterday who cites Jane as “his hero”, I feel grateful to learn about her and her amazing, positive work around gaming and how it can change the world.

I don’t relate to the term gaming, but when I asked my friend what constituted a game, his response was along the lines of this: “A game is anything where we create a set of artificial obstacles (rules) to achieve an end goal”. So, all sports, board games, anything – really, that fits that definition, is a game. And if you partake, you’re a gamer. So, now that I know I’m a gamer (aren’t we all?) – what can we do as “gamers” to change the world?

McGonigal’s “Ted talk” can more easily convey some of her grand and beautifully elegant ideas than I ever could. Her breakthrough thinking could easily change our collective lives, and already has. Learn about the history of “gaming” and about some of McGonigal’s real-life applications that have tackled peak oil, famine, and disease.

Thoughts from the Green Building Trenches

“Leadership should be born out of the understanding of the needs of those who would be affected by it.” ~Marian Anderson

Green building has come a long way since the United States Green Building Council’s (USGBC) building standard, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), took hold about a decade ago. As the market transformed and more bold standards were realized, working towards the creation of truly sustainable buildings and neighborhoods proved to be an effective way to tackle our current environmental crisis. Yet, there’s still much work left to do and many voices to be represented. Until we are able to provide a heightened level of respect within our immediate circles and organizations and begin to truly start “walking the talk”, we will surely fail in our attempt to “save the world”.

The story I am about to tell is nothing new, and it repeats itself across boardrooms and cubicles every day. Workers are unhappy, from assembly lines to classrooms and office parks to city halls. You’d be hard pressed to look for business books without running smack dab into dense offerings on leadership, organizational improvement through narrative (a la Let My People Go Surfing) and explorations of overcoming workplace politics and angst. The book that has recently resonated with me the most is “The No Asshole Rule” by Bob Sutton.

Sutton, a professor of Organizational Behavior at Stanford Business School, as well as a professor of Engineering there, has dealt with his fair share of assholes, as he describes in his thought-provoking book. Sutton makes a comprehensive and solid argument for how assholes cost organizations, from lost productivity to the real costs of having an asshole on board. So much so, that many highly successful organizations – like Google and Zappos – have instituted the “no asshole rule”, requiring new hires to agree by signing on the dotted line. This deliberate act often ensures that unsavory behavior is not exhibited in the first place, and sends a message that if it is, it will not be tolerated. (Sutton warns, though, that simply acting as if you have this policy but not enforcing it, is worse than not having the policy at all).

So, are you, or is someone you love, a certified asshole? Admittedly, we have all exhibited the characteristics of an asshole from time-to-time. Try as we might, we all do the best that we can with the skills that we have in order to get by in this world, but often fall short of our aspirations. And that’s totally acceptable as we yearn to better ourselves. But I’m talking about certified assholes; individuals who allow their insecurities, bullying, and abuse of power to run amok, unchecked, ultimately infecting everyone around them with their noxious gases.

Suttons’ “dirty dozen list of everyday asshole actions” includes personal insults, rude interruptions, two-faced attacks, and treating people as if they are invisible, along with other highly repugnant behavior.

Sadly, the personality exhibited by this “dirty dozen” list paints the picture of an unhappy individual working from a place of pain and fear. The pain of feeling less than, or inferior, and the fear of being rejected and unloved. It’s an incredibly sad situation, and one that deserves immediate, sincere attention. More often than not, though, these sometimes subtle behaviors are never addressed.

I would know. My former boss isn’t a certified asshole, per se, but when I take the quiz to assess whether or not she fits the description, she “passes” the test with flying colors. Almost every question on that list is something she would answer yes to, if she were able to be brutally honest with herself.

Neither she, nor the organization that continues to celebrate her talents and promote her behavior, are unable to look at this bleak situation honestly, which is too bad. Because I believe that she could learn to address her wheelbarrow full of baggage, refocus her energies onto her many talents, and remove her incredible insecurities and scorn so that, ultimately, her gifts and the gifts of her peers could take center stage. Sadly, the organization seems ever positioned to stroke her ailing ego, thus nurturing her willingness to put her work first – above all else – ensuring that the leaders continue to shine, no matter the cost. Ultimately, this has helped to diminish the input of colleagues who offer alternate solutions or challenge the leadership in any way.

I used to imagine how our relationship could have been different if my former boss weren’t always competing with me and her colleagues. How it might help solve daily problems if she was willing to truly mentor and share her knowledge and talent, rather than speak down to her subordinates and make them feel lousy most of the time. Unfortunately, her willingness to work constantly outrageous hours (while wearing it as a badge of honor, of course), along with her incredible ability to produce, has enabled the organization to turn a blind eye to the serious problems that exist with her management “style”.

If the incredibly basic needs of respect and collaboration can’t even be met at a respected, progressive non-profit working towards tranforming the built environment and beyond, how then will we traverse from our current state to an enlightened one where truly sustainable goals can be realized? How, pray tell, will the requirements of transparency that are expected of manufacturers and industry be met when a small non-profit veils its upper-level decisions and overall day-to-day operations in a thick cloud of secrecy and deception? This Machiavellian approach to “transforming” the built environment will no doubt result in a place only fit for a Prince.

Imagine a truly professional environment, where an organization helps to support the “asshole” so that she can heal herself. This path would help to begin the “detoxification” of the group, allowing it and its employees to focus on the work at hand, rather than rewarding asshole behavior with promotions, more power, and more people to manage and infect with one’s own toxicity. These progressive values, so often expressed as a base level requirement in mission based/non-profit environments, is especially important to achieve, if only for the sake of not being so ironically contradicting.

Unfortunately, I’ve seen first hand the realities on the ground, and our collective hope of reshaping business-as-usual is currently falling far short from our ideals. We must nurture and respect the input of all involved, ESPECIALLY those on the front lines doing the hard work, rather than merely giving lip service to such a thing, ever maintaining the upper echelon of our beloved top-down models. We must put to death our fear-based proclamations of propriety, recognition, and entitlement. Then, and only then, will we begin the transformation, finally shedding the cocoon that protects the outdated, inaccurate view of reality that so many collectively, desperately cling to.

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Search the site

Recent Comments

  • Enja McGuire on Ethnography or Exploitation?
  • domain on Guerilla Gardening
  • Patty on Passport to the Universe
  • Jack on Ethnography or Exploitation?
  • chelsea on KCMO – Flyin’ Smart

Categories

links

  • AdPulp
  • And That Got Me Thinking
  • Big Daddy Seashell
  • Bohemian Girl
  • Burnin'
  • Chicago Public Radio
  • Clicks and Bits
  • Evil Vince
  • Guardian Blog
  • Leftover Cheese
  • Media Matters
  • Moon Phases
  • NPR
  • Octavia’s Haze
  • Old Town School
  • PBS
  • School of the Americas WATCH
  • Snap Design
  • Straw Dog
  • The Onion
  • Third Coast Audio Fest